Physical premise (IDWT): Physical spacetime has infinitely many ordinary spatial dimensions plus time. Matter occupies up to ten spatial dimensions; all remaining spatial directions are unbound for every particle. Depth counts a pattern's bound spatial involvement within that space. “Observed” and “unobserved” describe an observer's access, not different kinds of dimension. Older projective and nested-geometry calculations below retain their additional hypotheses; they do not establish a separate physical manifold or compactified direction. See spatial meaning and mathematical scope.
Summary: A finite-inertia rank-three nuclear plane coupled reciprocally to a 6D electron preserves its projector constraints, energy, visible momentum, and combined rotational charge while undergoing nontrivial orientation response.
Purpose
The plane-response audit showed that a nuclear three-plane needs conjugate momentum. This note constructs that missing finite-inertia system before any molecular periodic orbit is sought. It is a consistency model for reciprocal orientation dynamics, not a microscopic identification of the nuclear kernel.
Hamiltonian variables and interaction
Let describe the electron, let describe the lower-depth nuclear centre, and let
be its oriented three-plane. A skew matrix is the plane's angular velocity and carries kinetic energy , with .
For the selected bound-within/free-without ontology use the cylindrical distance
and . Coordinates perpendicular to the nuclear plane do not increase separation from its cylindrical support. The numerical consistency run uses dimensionless , , and . These values are not fitted to an atom. An earlier interpolation gave the nucleus finite unobserved localization and has been removed as inconsistent with this ontology.
Reciprocal equations
Write . Variation under fixes the plane equations
The electron receives . The three-coordinate nuclear centre receives the opposite visible component . This respects the depth mismatch: the nucleus is not assigned unobserved translational momentum.
The torque factor and sign are fixed by differentiating the common energy. They are also required for the visible rotational Noether charge
to be conserved. The minus sign reflects the angular-velocity convention in .
Nonlinear verification
Sixteen independent random states check the differential conservation of energy, visible total momentum, and . A nonlinear integration over 18 model time units gives:
| quantity | maximum error |
|---|---|
| total energy | |
| projector idempotence | |
| visible total momentum | |
| visible rotational charge |
Symmetry of , skewness of , and remain preserved. The final projector differs from its initial value by more than in norm, so conservation is not a consequence of a frozen plane.
What this changes
The project now has an energy-conserving mechanism by which a flexible lower-depth nucleus can store orientation momentum and return it to a 6D electron. This closes the phase-space consistency gap identified in the finite-response note.
It does not yet establish gyroscopic stabilization of the trigonal saddle. The next calculation must duplicate this rotor for all symmetry-related nuclei, regularize the supported-plane Coulomb singularity using the derived finite nuclear profile, and compute the full monodromy matrix. The physical kernel must eventually determine , , and the finite-size profile rather than accepting diagnostic values.
Reproduction
nuclear_plane_rotor_checks.py checks the differential identities, nonlinear evolution, projector constraints, Noether charges, and nontrivial plane response.
Related
- Finite nuclear-plane response — prerequisite: proves why conjugate orientation momentum is required and gives the local gyroscopic stability target.
- Reciprocal cylindrical molecule — continuation: combines multiple rotors with moving nuclear centres, the finite profile, and a relative electron source.