Summary: A normalized coherent symbol of specified finite width has an exact full Toeplitz spectrum and a controlled point-contact error, with distinct fixed-width and fixed-band limits.

Specify a width independently of the retained band

On the auxiliary mode-ray space CPd\mathbb{CP}^d, use unit FS measure, HN=H0(CPd,O(N))\mathcal H_N=H^0(\mathbb{CP}^d,\mathcal O(N)) and DN=(N+dd)D_N=\binom{N+d}{d}. These are the mode fibres of the projective contact comparison, not additional physical spatial dimensions.

For a specified ray zz and integer p≥0p\ge0, define the positive symbol

fp,z(u)=Dp∣u†z∣2p,∫fp,zdν=1,TN,p=PNfp,zPN.(1) f_{p,z}(u)=D_p|u^\dagger z|^{2p},\qquad \int f_{p,z}d\nu=1, \qquad T_{N,p}=P_N f_{p,z}P_N. \tag{1}

Here pp fixes the source width independently of the band NN. p=0p=0 is uniform; increasing pp concentrates the source about zz. It is a prescribed comparison symbol. Its width and source variation would need to follow from the master action in a physical application.

Exact full spectrum

Choose z=e0z=e_0. Phase integration makes TN,pT_{N,p} diagonal on normalized monomials. If their zeroth occupation is kk, the FS moments are

∫∏r=0d∣ur∣2mrdν=d!∏rmr!(d+∑rmr)!. \int\prod_{r=0}^{d}|u_r|^{2m_r}d\nu =\frac{d!\prod_r m_r!}{(d+\sum_r m_r)!}.

These follow from iterated Euler beta integrals on the unit simplex. Substitution into (1) gives

λk(N,p)=Dp(N+d)!(N+p+d)!(p+k)!k!,mk=(N−k+d−1d−1).(2) \boxed{\lambda_k(N,p) =D_p\frac{(N+d)!}{(N+p+d)!}\frac{(p+k)!}{k!}, \qquad m_k=\binom{N-k+d-1}{d-1}.} \tag{2}

For p>0p>0 these eigenvalues increase with kk. In particular,

λtop(N,p)=DNDpDN+p,λN−jλtop=N(N−1)⋯(N−j+1)(N+p)(N+p−1)⋯(N+p−j+1).(3) \boxed{\lambda_{\rm top}(N,p)=\frac{D_ND_p}{D_{N+p}}, \qquad \frac{\lambda_{N-j}}{\lambda_{\rm top}} =\frac{N(N-1)\cdots(N-j+1)} {(N+p)(N+p-1)\cdots(N+p-j+1)}.} \tag{3}

Every eigenvalue is positive at finite pp, and ∑kmkλk=DN\sum_k m_k\lambda_k=D_N. At p=0p=0, (2) gives the identity operator. At p=Np=N, (3) reproduces the smooth coherent-density coefficient DN2/D2ND_N^2/D_{2N} used in the complete quartic action.

Exact distance from point contact

At fixed N≥1N\ge1, p→∞p\to\infty gives TN,p→DN∣z;N⟩⟨z;N∣T_{N,p}\to D_N|z;N\rangle\langle z;N|. The coherent line is its top eigenvector for every pp. The sum of all complementary eigenvalues is DN−λtopD_N-\lambda_{\rm top}, so no complementary eigenvalue exceeds that deficit. Therefore

∥TN,p−DN∣z;N⟩⟨z;N∣∥DN=εN,p=1−DpDN+p=1−∏i=1dp+ip+N+i.(4) \boxed{\frac{\|T_{N,p}-D_N|z;N\rangle\langle z;N|\|}{D_N} =\varepsilon_{N,p} =1-\frac{D_p}{D_{N+p}} =1-\prod_{i=1}^d\frac{p+i}{p+N+i}.} \tag{4}

Writing each factor as 1−N/(p+N+i)1-N/(p+N+i), the product bound ∏(1−ai)≥1−∑ai\prod(1-a_i)\ge1-\sum a_i and 1−ai≤e−ai1-a_i\le e^{-a_i} give

1−exp⁡[−dNp+N+d]≤εN,p≤dNp+N+1.(5) \boxed{1-\exp\left[-\frac{dN}{p+N+d}\right] \le\varepsilon_{N,p}\le\frac{dN}{p+N+1}.} \tag{5}

The upper bound may exceed one; (4) gives the exact value. These formulas state quantitatively how narrow a specified symbol must be for the point operator to be a useful approximation.

For two bands N2>N1N_2>N_1 with the same pp,

λtop(N2,p)λtop(N1,p)=DN2DN1∏i=1dp+N1+ip+N2+i.(6) \frac{\lambda_{\rm top}(N_2,p)}{\lambda_{\rm top}(N_1,p)} =\frac{D_{N_2}}{D_{N_1}} \prod_{i=1}^d\frac{p+N_1+i}{p+N_2+i}. \tag{6}

Its relative correction to the point-contact ratio is independent of an overall common scale and remains nonzero at every finite pp. This is an operator comparison; extracting particle frequencies still requires the complete normalized spatial field equation.

Limits with different physical inputs

At fixed pp and N→∞N\to\infty, λtop(N,p)→Dp=∥fp,z∥∞\lambda_{\rm top}(N,p)\to D_p=\|f_{p,z}\|_\infty. It stays bounded while DND_N grows. More generally, ∥PNfPN∥≤∥f∥∞\|P_N fP_N\|\le\|f\|_\infty for any fixed bounded multiplier. A bounded symbol of fixed amplitude and width cannot produce an unbounded simplex eigenvalue merely by increasing the cutoff.

If instead p/N→a>0p/N\to a>0, then

λtop(N,p)DN⟶(a1+a)d.(7) \frac{\lambda_{\rm top}(N,p)}{D_N} \longrightarrow\left(\frac a{1+a}\right)^d. \tag{7}

The leading simplex power can therefore coexist with a shrinking source width, but (7) is asymptotic. It does not make the finite-band coefficient exactly independent of NN. A prescribed NN-dependent width must be explained by the same action and normalization as the other field data.

There is also an exact extremal statement. For any positive unit measure μ\mu on the ray space, define

Tμ=DN∫∣u;N⟩⟨u;N∣ dμ(u). T_\mu=D_N\int|u;N\rangle\langle u;N|\,d\mu(u).

Then ∥Tμ∥≤DN\|T_\mu\|\le D_N. Equality for a normalized vector vv requires ∣⟨v,u;N⟩∣=1|\langle v,u;N\rangle|=1 for μ\mu-almost every uu. For N≥1N\ge1, distinct projective rays give distinct coherent lines; thus equality holds exactly when μ\mu is a point measure. This statement uses the positive unit-measure convention. Signed symbols, different total source strength or additional operator terms change its hypotheses.

Consistent band contacts addresses the separate requirement that a proposed family arise from one common bare operator or a specified effective reduction.

Verification

coherent_kernel_consistency_checks.py checks (2) by independent beta quadrature and complete CP1 matrices, the exact trace and full error spectrum, both bounds in (5), finite band ratios, and the distinct limits in (3) and (7).