Summary: A full Dirac field on a conditional spatial half-cylinder induces the absolute tangential Dirac operator, while its kinetic norm cancels a constant bulk mass factor and local scalar contact excites complementary normal profiles.

Obtain a nonlocal operator from ordinary spatial continuation

The Killing-spinor transfer gives a Hermitian scalar-mass candidate when its polynomial is evaluated on the absolute spatial Dirac operator:

M^d=Qd(R∣D∣)d!,Qd(x)=∏j=1d/2(x−j)(x+j−1).(1) \widehat M_d=\frac{Q_d(R|\mathscr D|)}{d!},\qquad Q_d(x)=\prod_{j=1}^{d/2}(x-j)(x+j-1). \tag{1}

It has the desired simplex eigenvalues on both Dirac signs, under the specified round geometry. The absolute value makes it spatially nonlocal. A natural question is whether ordinary spatial continuation of the same field can supply that absolute value.

An exact product-space calculation does supply it as a map from a field's value to its perpendicular derivative. However, that same continuation induces a nontrivial time-kinetic norm. A constant bulk scalar coefficient remains constant after canonical normalization. A local nonlinear scalar source also drives normal profiles outside the initially selected decaying profile.

These statements concern a conditional geometry and boundary problem. Take a six-dimensional spatial manifold Q6Q_6 and one ordinary perpendicular coordinate y≥0y\ge0, with metric dy2+gQ6dy^2+g_{Q_6}. The six tangential directions remain equivalent in kind. No dimension is compactified and no small geometric radius is assumed. This is a local normal-direction benchmark, not an assignment of a seven-dimensional particle or a derivation of the full six-to-ten nesting. Multiple normal directions require their complete Clifford structure and cannot be supplied by independent scalar copies.

A nested spatial submanifold does not itself impose a hard boundary, a one-sided domain or a decaying boundary condition. Those are explicit extra assumptions here. All retained and complementary profiles below are modes of the same Dirac field.

Keep the full parent spinor

Let the tangential operators satisfy

D†=D,β†=β,β2=I,{D,β}=0,A=∣D∣>0.(2) \mathscr D^\dagger=\mathscr D,\qquad \beta^\dagger=\beta,\qquad \beta^2=I,\qquad \{\mathscr D,\beta\}=0,\qquad A=|\mathscr D|>0. \tag{2}

Assume a positive spectral gap, as on the conditional round sphere, where AA has values (k+3)/R(k+3)/R. Initially work on smooth finite spectral sums; the integrated formulas then extend on their indicated quadratic-form domains.

The parent scalar matrix must be distinct from the new spatial Clifford matrix. On the full doubled spinor bundle set

D=(D00D),αy=(0ββ0),βp=(β00−β).(3) \mathbb D= \begin{pmatrix}\mathscr D&0\\0&\mathscr D\end{pmatrix},\quad \alpha_y= \begin{pmatrix}0&\beta\\\beta&0\end{pmatrix},\quad \beta_p= \begin{pmatrix}\beta&0\\0&-\beta\end{pmatrix}. \tag{3}

The two last matrices are Hermitian involutions. They anticommute with each other and with D\mathbb D. For an ordinary rank-eight six-dimensional spinor, (3) retains all sixteen components of this parent Hamiltonian. These are field components, not additional spatial coordinates or particles.

The massless parent spatial operator is

H0=D−iαy∂y.(4) H_0=\mathbb D-i\alpha_y\partial_y. \tag{4}

This product form belongs to the standard theory of Dirac Cauchy data and their spectral projectors; see Sharma, Introduction, pages 2–3. The particular lift, norm and scalar-action calculations needed here follow directly below.

Construct the complete decaying lift

Define the tangential involution and the parent isometry

T=iβDA−1,T†=T,T2=I,V=12(IT).(5) T=i\beta\mathscr D A^{-1},\qquad T^\dagger=T,\qquad T^2=I,\qquad V=\frac1{\sqrt2}\begin{pmatrix}I\\T\end{pmatrix}. \tag{5}

Write Ap=diag⁡(A,A)A_p=\operatorname{diag}(A,A) and K=iαyDK=i\alpha_y\mathbb D. Direct multiplication gives

K†=K,K2=Ap2,KV=VA,V†V=I,VV†=Π+=12(I+KAp−1),βpV=Vβ,V†αyV=0.(6) \begin{gathered} K^\dagger=K,\qquad K^2=A_p^2,\qquad KV=VA,\\ V^\dagger V=I,\qquad VV^\dagger=\Pi_+=\frac12(I+KA_p^{-1}),\\ \beta_pV=V\beta,\qquad V^\dagger\alpha_yV=0. \end{gathered} \tag{6}

Thus VV spans the entire decaying half of the parent data and retains every tangential polarization. The scalar matrix preserves this subspace. The last identity makes its normal flux vanish for arbitrary complex data.

For a tangential trace variable ff, set

F(y)=Ve−yAf.(7) F(y)=V e^{-yA}f. \tag{7}

Since H0=−iαy(∂y+K)H_0=-i\alpha_y(\partial_y+K), equations (6)–(7) give

H0F=0,−∂yF(0)=VAf.(8) \boxed{ H_0F=0,\qquad -\partial_yF(0)=VAf. } \tag{8}

The positive operator A=∣D∣A=|\mathscr D| is therefore the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator: it maps the boundary field value to its outward derivative. A mode with A=λA=\lambda decays over length 1/λ1/\lambda, or R/(k+3)R/(k+3) on the round six-space. This is a field profile length under the assumed geometry, not compactification.

The tangential and normal kinetic terms cancel in (8). Retaining only one of them would give a different reduced equation.

Normalize the entire action

The trace ff does not have the canonical norm of the parent field. Integration over the normal coordinate gives

∥F∥2=⟨f,Zf⟩,Z=∫0∞e−2yAdy=12A.(9) \|F\|^2=\langle f,Zf\rangle,\qquad Z=\int_0^\infty e^{-2yA}dy=\frac1{2A}. \tag{9}

Consequently the time-kinetic term is i⟨f,Z∂tf⟩i\langle f,Z\partial_t f\rangle. The canonically normalized tangential variable is

χ=Z1/2f,f=(2A)1/2χ.(10) \chi=Z^{1/2}f,\qquad f=(2A)^{1/2}\chi. \tag{10}

As a linear control, add a constant real scalar coefficient MM to the parent equation, giving HM=H0+MβpH_M=H_0+M\beta_p. Here MM is prescribed; the local self-interaction will be tested separately. Its bulk energy is

EM(F)=M∫0∞⟨F(y),βpF(y)⟩ dy=M⟨f,βZf⟩=M⟨χ,βχ⟩.(11) \begin{aligned} E_M(F) &=M\int_0^\infty\langle F(y),\beta_pF(y)\rangle\,dy\\ &=M\langle f,\beta Zf\rangle =M\langle\chi,\beta\chi\rangle. \end{aligned} \tag{11}

The last equality uses [A,β]=0[A,\beta]=0. The resulting canonical equation and exact lifted solution are

i∂tχ=Mβχ,F(t,y)=Ve−yA(2A)1/2e−itMβχ0.(12) i\partial_t\chi=M\beta\chi,\qquad F(t,y)=Ve^{-yA}(2A)^{1/2}e^{-itM\beta}\chi_0. \tag{12}

Substitution verifies (12) in every component of the full parent equation, with the specified decaying boundary data. The coefficient is MM, independent of tangential level. The nonlocal operator in (8) has not become a mass enhancement. Its inverse also enters the kinetic norm and cancels from (11).

For comparison, a separately specified boundary quadratic form b⟨f,βf⟩b\langle f,\beta f\rangle compresses in the same canonical variables to

E∂=2b⟨χ,Aβχ⟩.(13) E_{\partial}=2b\langle\chi,A\beta\chi\rangle. \tag{13}

This gives a first-degree inverse-width factor, with a new boundary coefficient. It is the compression of an additional form onto (7). Its complete boundary condition and changed normal profile must still be solved before (13) is treated as an exact physical spectrum. The full polynomial and normalization in (1) have not been derived.

Specified contribution Form in the trace variable Canonical compressed form
Time-kinetic norm ⟨f,12Af⟩\langle f,\frac1{2A}f\rangle ⟨χ,χ⟩\langle\chi,\chi\rangle
Constant bulk scalar term M⟨f,β2Af⟩M\langle f,\frac{\beta}{2A}f\rangle M⟨χ,βχ⟩M\langle\chi,\beta\chi\rangle
Additional boundary scalar term b⟨f,βf⟩b\langle f,\beta f\rangle 2b⟨χ,Aβχ⟩2b\langle\chi,A\beta\chi\rangle

Why a free normal extension does not select a bound particle

On a complete normal line y∈Ry\in\mathbb R, decay toward positive yy requires data in Ran⁡Π+\operatorname{Ran}\Pi_+; decay toward negative yy requires data in Ran⁡Π−\operatorname{Ran}\Pi_-, where Π−=I−Π+\Pi_-=I-\Pi_+. Their intersection is zero.

Hence a smooth zero-frequency solution of H0F=0H_0F=0 cannot use both free decays across y=0y=0 with nonzero continuous data. The same obstruction applies to the lifted scalar eigensolutions of (12) at frequencies ±M\pm M: after selecting their scalar eigenvalue, the remaining spatial equation is again H0F=0H_0F=0. An interface, a boundary law or a nonlinear binding mechanism would have to supply different matching dynamics.

This concerns this product-space construction. It does not exclude different normal geometries or a fully solved nonlinear profile. It also does not replace IDWT's cylindrical free continuation by an already established localized normal profile.

Vary the actual local scalar contact

The round local-gap construction provides the exact spatial pair ε,ξ=βε\varepsilon,\xi=\beta\varepsilon. Its Dirac eigenvalues are +λ+\lambda and −λ-\lambda, respectively, with λ=3/R\lambda=3/R. The pair is pointwise orthonormal. Its scalar-current matrix is the ordinary Pauli XX, and arbitrary complex coefficients give a spatially constant scalar current.

On this pair, VV in (5) is represented pointwise by the same isometry as in the operator calculation. Choose a tangential field χ=aε+bξ\chi=a\varepsilon+b\xi and define

wλ(y)=2λ e−λy,F(y,q)=wλ(y)Vχ(q),j=χ†βχ,ρ=χ†χ.(14) w_\lambda(y)=\sqrt{2\lambda}\,e^{-\lambda y},\qquad F(y,q)=w_\lambda(y)V\chi(q),\qquad j=\chi^\dagger\beta\chi,\quad \rho=\chi^\dagger\chi. \tag{14}

Both jj and ρ\rho are constant on the spatial sphere. Tangential spatial measure is held fixed throughout; unit spatial measure may be used to isolate the normal normalization. The elementary normal integrals are

∫0∞wλ2dy=1,∫0∞wλ4dy=λ,∫0∞wλ6dy=43λ2.(15) \int_0^\infty w_\lambda^2dy=1,\qquad \int_0^\infty w_\lambda^4dy=\lambda,\qquad \int_0^\infty w_\lambda^6dy=\frac43\lambda^2. \tag{15}

Consider the written local parent scalar energy κ∫(F†βpF)2/2\kappa\int(F^\dagger\beta_pF)^2/2. Its compression onto (14) gives

Eintcomp=κλ2∫Q6j2 dμ,Ncomp(χ)=κλjβχ.(16) E_{\rm int}^{\rm comp} =\frac{\kappa\lambda}{2}\int_{Q_6}j^2\,d\mu,\qquad N_{\rm comp}(\chi)=\kappa\lambda j\beta\chi. \tag{16}

This inverse-width coefficient is obtained from the actual local quartic interaction with its canonical normal norm. But compression alone is not the complete nonlinear equation.

The full local source is

N(F)=κwλ3j βpVχ.(17) N(F)=\kappa w_\lambda^3 j\,\beta_pV\chi. \tag{17}

Its normal profile is wλ3w_\lambda^3, not wλw_\lambda. Let Wχ=wλVχW\chi=w_\lambda V\chi be the canonical lift on the pair. Then its projection is W†N=κλjβχW^\dagger N=\kappa\lambda j\beta\chi, and the complementary normal source obeys

∥(I−WW†)N∥y2=κ2λ2j2ρ3.(18) \boxed{ \|(I-WW^\dagger)N\|_y^2 =\frac{\kappa^2\lambda^2j^2\rho}{3}. } \tag{18}

Here the norm integrates the normal coordinate at a spatial point; integrating over Q6Q_6 gives the full spatial statement. Indeed, (15) gives ∥N∥y2=4κ2λ2j2ρ/3\|N\|_y^2=4\kappa^2\lambda^2j^2\rho/3, whereas ∥W†N∥2=κ2λ2j2ρ\|W^\dagger N\|^2=\kappa^2\lambda^2j^2\rho. Their difference proves (18). For nonzero current the omitted force is one half of the full force norm, or 1/31/\sqrt3 times its retained part.

The source stays within the spatial Killing pair, so this residual already lies in genuine complementary normal profiles; it is not an artifact of omitting angular spinor modes. The fixed decaying lift is therefore not an exact nonlinear invariant family for nonzero local scalar current. Solving those profiles can change both the effective interaction and its normalization, as the nonlinear mass reduction explains.

Solve the full-line binding question within the spatial Killing channel

For this spatial pair, the complete nonlinear normal problem admits a stronger conclusion than the residual (18). Retain four arbitrary complex functions of yy: the two spatial Killing coefficients in each parent block. Write their vector as z(y)∈C4z(y)\in\mathbb C^4. This includes growing, decaying and oscillatory normal profiles; the lift (14) is no longer imposed.

The spatial pair has constant Gram and scalar matrices, so its complete local source is still independent of the tangential point. On a full normal line the stationary equation is

(Dλ+Km)z=ωz,Km=−iαy∂y+m(y)βp,Dλ=I2⊗(λ00−λ),m(y)=κz†βpz.(19) \begin{gathered} (D_\lambda+K_m)z=\omega z,\qquad K_m=-i\alpha_y\partial_y+m(y)\beta_p,\\ D_\lambda=I_2\otimes \begin{pmatrix}\lambda&0\\0&-\lambda\end{pmatrix}, \qquad m(y)=\kappa z^\dagger\beta_p z. \end{gathered} \tag{19}

In this equation αy\alpha_y and βp\beta_p are the four-component restrictions of (3). The normal direction is free at both infinities; there is no boundary or external normal potential. Assume a bounded smooth field of finite canonical normal norm. Then mm is bounded and integrable because ∣m(y)∣≤∣κ∣ ∣z(y)∣2|m(y)|\le|\kappa|\,|z(y)|^2. The stationary equation puts zz in H1H^1.

Since mm depends only on yy, the exact identities are

{Dλ,Km}=0,Dλ2=λ2I.(20) \{D_\lambda,K_m\}=0,\qquad D_\lambda^2=\lambda^2I. \tag{20}

Integration by parts on H1H^1 gives the norm identity

(ω2−λ2)∥z∥2=∥Kmz∥2≥0.(21) \boxed{ (\omega^2-\lambda^2)\|z\|^2=\|K_mz\|^2\ge0. } \tag{21}

Thus no nonzero bound state can have ∣ω∣<λ|\omega|<\lambda, even with a completely relaxed nonlinear normal profile. At ∣ω∣=λ|\omega|=\lambda, equation (21) requires Kmz=0K_mz=0. Its exact first-order solution has the form

z(y)=exp⁡ ⁣[−iαyβp∫y0ym(s) ds]z(y0).(22) z(y)=\exp\!\left[-i\alpha_y\beta_p \int_{y_0}^{y}m(s)\,ds\right]z(y_0). \tag{22}

The integral stays finite at infinity. This matrix and its inverse therefore stay bounded, so nonzero initial data cannot approach zero in norm and cannot be square integrable.

Finally suppose ∣ω∣>λ|\omega|>\lambda. The stationary equation is

z′=B0z+m(y)Cz,B0=iαy(ω−Dλ),C=−iαyβp.(23) z'=B_0z+m(y)Cz,\qquad B_0=i\alpha_y(\omega-D_\lambda),\qquad C=-i\alpha_y\beta_p. \tag{23}

Here B02=−(ω2−λ2)IB_0^2=-(\omega^2-\lambda^2)I, so both eyB0e^{yB_0} and e−yB0e^{-yB_0} are uniformly bounded. In the interaction variable a(y)=e−yB0z(y)a(y)=e^{-yB_0}z(y),

a′=m(y)e−yB0CeyB0a.(24) a'=m(y)e^{-yB_0}Ce^{yB_0}a. \tag{24}

Its coefficient has integrable operator norm. Gronwall's inequality applied in both directions gives a strictly positive lower bound on ∣a(y)∣|a(y)| for every nonzero initial value. The bounded inverse free evolution gives the same lower bound on ∣z(y)∣|z(y)|. Square integrability is again impossible.

Equations (21)–(24) exhaust real stationary frequencies. Hence the written local scalar interaction has no nonzero bounded smooth stationary field of finite normal norm on the full line within this complete spatial Killing channel, for either sign of κ\kappa. This result retains all four complex normal amplitudes and their self-consistent current.

Its scope is the selected spatial pair and product geometry. Tangentially varying currents, coupling to other spatial modes, different normal geometry and boundary dynamics change the problem. Normal localization itself is not an established requirement of IDWT's cylindrical free continuation. The theorem settles this particular attempted mechanism without selecting a physical geometry.

The calculation identifies an explicit spatial origin for ∣D∣|\mathscr D| and follows it through the full spinor and action normalization. Deriving the complete simplex mass operator still requires a normal geometry and boundary or binding law inherited from the master field, together with its consistent nonlinear spatial solution.

Verification

normal_dirac_extension_checks.py checks every Clifford anticommutator of the rank-sixteen parent, the complete decaying projector and scalar intertwining, and arbitrary complex paired tangential spectra under unitary changes of basis. These paired matrices test operator identities; they are not a replacement for curved spatial multiplicities.

Independent normal quadrature verifies the induced kinetic metric, bulk scalar energy and profile moments. Full complex action variations check both bulk and boundary forms and the local quartic source. The last tests differentiate the actual six-dimensional Killing fields in a spatial chart, retain both parent blocks, and measure the complementary normal force in (18). Independent normal Fourier matrices test the full anticommutation and positive square in (20)–(21) with spatially varying scalar profiles and all four complex amplitudes. Those finite periodic matrices verify operator algebra; the full-line nonexistence statement follows from the analytic argument (21)–(24).