The linked geometry's second variation and its positive mode metric can be expressed by one first-order matrix operator. Its coefficients follow from differentiating the geometric equations; they are not fitted to particle masses. The same bounded radial function that determines the metric identities also gives an explicit spectral gap.

This is a spatial geometric calculation on an ordinary unbounded plane. The metric remains a stated kinetic comparison, without an assigned physical time coefficient. The calculation does not identify geometric fluctuations with a microscopic spinor or introduce another particle.

The complete quadratic form

Let Di=∂i−iAiD_i=\partial_i-iA_i, B=∂1A2−∂2A1B=\partial_1A_2-\partial_2A_1, and use the linked equations

(D1+iD2)W=0,B=2(1−∣W∣2).(1) (D_1+iD_2)W=0,\qquad B=2(1-|W|^2). \tag{1}

For winding dd, the geometric cost satisfies

G=∫(∣DW∣2+B24+(1−∣W∣2)2)d2y,G−2πd=∫(∣(D1+iD2)W∣2+[B2−1+∣W∣2]2)d2y.(2) \begin{aligned} G&=\int\left(|DW|^2+\frac{B^2}{4}+(1-|W|^2)^2\right)d^2y,\\ G-2\pi d&=\int\left(|(D_1+iD_2)W|^2+ \left[\frac B2-1+|W|^2\right]^2\right)d^2y. \end{aligned} \tag{2}

Boundary conditions preserve the winding and make the variations decay. For arbitrary complex δW\delta W and real δA\delta A, define

F=(D1+iD2)δW−i(δA1+iδA2)W,b=δB2+2Re⁡(W∗δW),g=12∇⋅δA−2Im⁡(W∗δW).(3) \begin{aligned} F&=(D_1+iD_2)\delta W-i(\delta A_1+i\delta A_2)W,\\ b&=\frac{\delta B}{2}+2\operatorname{Re}(W^*\delta W),\\ g&=\frac12\nabla\cdot\delta A-2\operatorname{Im}(W^*\delta W). \end{aligned} \tag{3}

The coefficient of ϵ2\epsilon^2 in G(W+ϵδW,A+ϵδA)G(W+\epsilon\delta W,A+\epsilon\delta A) is G2=∫(∣F∣2+b2)G_2=\int(|F|^2+b^2). The positive horizontal metric is

∥δ∥M2=∫(∣δW∣2+14∣δA∣2)d2y,g=0.(4) \|\delta\|_M^2=\int\left(|\delta W|^2+\frac14|\delta A|^2\right)d^2y, \qquad g=0. \tag{4}

The condition g=0g=0 follows by orthogonality to the basis-phase variations (iζW,∇ζ)(i\zeta W,\nabla\zeta). It removes a description redundancy. It is not an independently imposed physical force.

Exact matrix factorization

Use α1=σ1⊗I\alpha_1=\sigma_1\otimes I, α2=σ2⊗I\alpha_2=\sigma_2\otimes I, Γ1=σ3⊗τ1\Gamma_1=\sigma_3\otimes\tau_1, Γ2=σ3⊗τ2\Gamma_2=\sigma_3\otimes\tau_2, and C=σ3⊗τ3C=\sigma_3\otimes\tau_3. Package the variation as

Ξ=(0,δW,δA1+iδA22,0)T,CΞ=−Ξ. \Xi=\left(0,\delta W,\frac{\delta A_1+i\delta A_2}{2},0\right)^T, \qquad C\Xi=-\Xi.

Then the self-adjoint spatial operator

Dgeo=−iα⋅∇+12α⋅A(τ3−I)+2Γ⋅W(5) \boxed{D_{\rm geo}=-i\alpha\cdot\nabla+ \frac12\alpha\cdot A(\tau_3-I)+2\Gamma\cdot W} \tag{5}

obeys, by direct component differentiation,

DgeoΞ=(b−ig,0,0,−iF)T,∥DgeoΞ∥2=G2+∫g2d2y.(6) \boxed{D_{\rm geo}\Xi=(b-ig,0,0,-iF)^T,\qquad \|D_{\rm geo}\Xi\|^2=G_2+\int g^2d^2y.} \tag{6}

Here Γ⋅W=Γ1Re⁡W+Γ2Im⁡W\Gamma\cdot W=\Gamma_1\operatorname{Re}W+\Gamma_2\operatorname{Im}W. Moreover ∥Ξ∥2=∥δ∥M2\|\Xi\|^2=\|\delta\|_M^2. Thus (5) supplies the actual quadratic form and its stated positive norm together. The coefficient two and the scalar connection shift in (5) are fixed by (3).

Writing Dgeo=(0Q†Q0)D_{\rm geo}=\left(\begin{smallmatrix}0&Q^\dagger\\Q&0\end{smallmatrix}\right) with the positive chirality listed first, the linked equation cancels the off-diagonal part of its positive-chiral square:

Q†Q=(−Δ+4∣W∣200(−i∇−A)2+B+4∣W∣2).(7) \boxed{Q^\dagger Q= \begin{pmatrix} -\Delta+4|W|^2&0\\ 0&(-i\nabla-A)^2+B+4|W|^2 \end{pmatrix}.} \tag{7}

This factorization retains both spatial coefficients and arbitrary angular perturbations. It is not restricted to a radial test function.

An explicit gap from the same bounded weight

At the radial configuration, W=w(r)eidθW=w(r)e^{id\theta}, A=a(r)eθ/rA=a(r)e_\theta/r, with w′=(d−a)w/rw'=(d-a)w/r, a′=2r(1−w2)a'=2r(1-w^2). Set

Z=d+1−a,1≤Z≤d+1. Z=d+1-a,\qquad 1\le Z\le d+1.

The metric identity gives (−Δ+4w2)Z=4(-\Delta+4w^2)Z=4. For any compactly supported scalar ff, integration by parts gives the exact positive-function identity

∫(∣∇f∣2+4w2∣f∣2)d2y=∫Z2∣∇(f/Z)∣2d2y+∫4Z∣f∣2d2y≥4d+1∥f∥2.(8) \int\left(|\nabla f|^2+4w^2|f|^2\right)d^2y =\int Z^2\left|\nabla(f/Z)\right|^2d^2y +\int\frac4Z|f|^2d^2y \ge\frac4{d+1}\|f\|^2. \tag{8}

Density extends this bound to the form domain. The other channel in (7) has B+4w2=2+2w2≥2B+4w^2=2+2w^2\ge2. Therefore, for d≥1d\ge1,

Q†Q≥4d+1,∣Dgeo∣≥2d+1on (ker⁡Dgeo)⊥.(9) \boxed{Q^\dagger Q\ge\frac4{d+1},\qquad |D_{\rm geo}|\ge\frac2{\sqrt{d+1}} \quad\text{on }(\ker D_{\rm geo})^\perp.} \tag{9}

The second statement follows because the two nonzero chiral spectra coincide. It controls the full normal continuum, not just a finite matrix.

Numerical lowest eigenvalues of the first channel refine to:

Depth Lowest squared geometric frequency Rigorous lower bound
3 1.61082153 1
4 1.27714407 0.8
5 1.05471334 0.66666667
6 0.89683327 0.57142857
10 0.55815750 0.36363636

Each lies below the second channel's lower bound two. The scalar radial ground state gives a horizontal physical variation: applying DgeoD_{\rm geo} to a real first-component ground state produces a negative-chiral fluctuation whose image has g=0g=0. The corresponding purely imaginary first-component comparison describes the removed gauge direction. Neither comparison is a particle mass assignment.

The complete zero-mode space

The horizontal polynomial variations have the form

Ξl=(0,eilθUl,iei(l−d+1)θVl,0)T,l=d−k, \Xi_l=(0,e^{il\theta}U_l, i e^{i(l-d+1)\theta}V_l,0)^T, \qquad l=d-k,

where

Ul′=l−arUl−2wVl,Vl′=d−1−lrVl−2wUl.(10) U_l'=\frac{l-a}{r}U_l-2wV_l,\qquad V_l'=\frac{d-1-l}{r}V_l-2wU_l. \tag{10}

The dd polynomial coordinates k=1,…,dk=1,\ldots,d give regular, decaying solutions. Conversely, integrating [r2(Ul2−Vl2)]′[r^2(U_l^2-V_l^2)]' gives

∫(l+1−a)Ul2d2y=(d−l)∫Vl2d2y.(11) \int(l+1-a)U_l^2d^2y=(d-l)\int V_l^2d^2y. \tag{11}

For k=d−l≤0k=d-l\le0, the left coefficient is strictly positive and the right is nonpositive. For k≥d+1k\ge d+1, the left is nonpositive and the right is positive. In each case both fields must vanish. There are no positive-chiral zero modes by (9). The full complex kernel therefore has exactly dd dimensions, corresponding to 2d2d real geometric variations, including translation.

Verification and physical scope

linked_geometric_jacobi.py and geometric_jacobi_checks.py verify (6) with independent Cartesian differentiation, (7) on arbitrary positive-chiral fields, the complete uncompleted energy's second variation, and every geometric zero mode at all five maintained depths. The 103-check report retains radial-grid and outer-boundary refinements and their raw modes. The carrier comparison additionally verifies the supersolution identity used in (8).

Equation (5) is now a candidate common differential expression for the geometry and the normal mass carrier. Its carrier comparison distinguishes the geometric rotation representation from an ordinary spinor representation. A common expression is useful structure, but does not by itself derive the same-field kinetic action, the occupied curved equilibrium, or the complete particle's positive inertia.