Contents · Previous · Next

ordinary R10\mathbb R^{10}, irrespective of the pattern's active depth. Write W=(1+∣x∣2/L2)−4W=(1+|x|^2/L^2)^{-4}, Zi=(xi/L)(1+∣x∣2/L2)−5Z_i=(x_i/L)(1+|x|^2/L^2)^{-5}, ρ=npeakW2\rho=n_{\rm peak}W^2, y=(s,z)y=(s,z), Ds=∇(W,Z)D_s=\nabla(W,Z) and Ms=diag⁡(MW,MZ,…,MZ)M_s=\operatorname{diag}(M_W,M_Z,\ldots,M_Z). Let fij=−fjif_{ij}=-f_{ji} be frame rotation, vv the ten-component flow variation and H=wL=C/2H=\sqrt w L=C/2. Put

b∗=∇θ+2HTX,Fi=∂iY−∑jHjfij,α=2s/W. b_* = \nabla\theta+2H^TX,\qquad F_i=\partial_iY-\sum_jH_jf_{ij},\qquad \alpha=2s/W.

The density equation gives r=α+θ˙/βr=\alpha+\dot\theta/\beta, where β=b\beta=b at the reference branch. Its elimination retains ραθ˙\rho\alpha\dot\theta as well as ρθ˙2/(2β)\rho\dot\theta^2/(2\beta). The other temporal squares are ρϵ(∣X˙∣2+∣Y˙+Hv∣2)/2\rho\epsilon(|\dot X|^2+|\dot Y+Hv|^2)/2 and (y˙+Dsv)TMs(y˙+Dsv)/2(\dot y+D_sv)^TM_s(\dot y+D_sv)/2, together with the frame and flow kinetic terms. The clock also retains ρ(2X⋅Y˙+ω∣v∣2/2+v⋅b∗)\rho(2X\cdot\dot Y+\omega|v|^2/2+v\cdot b_*); its spatial alignment term is −ρκ∣b∗+ωv∣2/2-\rho\kappa|b_*+\omega v|^2/2. Thus setting support, frame and flow to zero is generally not invariant. Their omitted equations would additionally require θ˙=0\dot\theta=0, Hb⋅∂aY−Ha⋅∂bY=0H_b\cdot\partial_aY-H_a\cdot\partial_bY=0 and (κω−1)b∗−ϵHTY˙=0(\kappa\omega-1)b_*-\epsilon H^T\dot Y=0.

In the conserved quadratic energy, velocity-linear terms cancel. The phase-flow potential completes to

ρκ2∣b∗+(ω−1/κ)v∣2+12vT[ρ(ω−1/κ)I−Sgrad]v,Sgrad=DsTMsDs+ρϵHTH. \frac{\rho\kappa}{2}|b_*+(\omega-1/\kappa)v|^2+ \frac12v^T\left[\rho(\omega-1/\kappa)I-S_{\rm grad}\right]v, \qquad S_{\rm grad}=D_s^TM_sD_s+\rho\epsilon H^TH.

The negative drift contributions in this expression are essential. For the existing common choices MW=MZ=npeakL2ωmin⁡/212M_W=M_Z=n_{\rm peak}L^2\omega_{\min}/212, ϵ=ωmin⁡ℓ2/(4M2)\epsilon=\omega_{\min}\ell^2/(4M^2) and κ=8/ωmin⁡\kappa=8/\omega_{\min}, the actual rational support obeys

∥Ds∥2W2≤321611600L2<21L2,Sgrad≤ρωmin⁡37106I, \frac{\|D_s\|^2}{W^2}\le\frac{32161}{1600L^2}<\frac{21}{L^2}, \qquad S_{\rm grad}\le\rho\omega_{\min}\frac{37}{106}I, ρ(ω−1/κ)I−Sgrad≥ρω223424I>0. \rho(\omega-1/\kappa)I-S_{\rm grad} \ge\rho\omega\frac{223}{424}I>0.

The alternative branch-flat κ=8/ω\kappa=8/\omega retains this sufficient margin. All other energy terms are the nonnegative carrier, support, frame and flow derivative or occupation squares. This is the second variation of E−ωQE-\omega Q at the branch, not an arbitrary-background laboratory-energy theorem. Its no-growing-mode conclusion requires a conserved finite-energy realization; positivity alone supplies neither a spectral gap nor nonlinear persistence. The full equations and support residuals are in coupled-spatial-support/report.md, independently checked in coupled-support-review/review.md with 506 exact assertions.

A useful exact spatial operator is Aρ=−ρ−1div⁡(ρ∇)A_\rho=-\rho^{-1}\operatorname{div}(\rho\nabla) on L2(ρ dx)L^2(\rho\,dx). The unitary transformation Uf=ρfUf=\sqrt\rho f gives

UAρU−1=−Δ−80L2(L2+∣x∣2)2. UA_\rho U^{-1}=-\Delta-\frac{80L^2}{(L^2+|x|^2)^2}.

The potential is bounded. The transformed operator has domain H2H^2, compact smooth core, and closed form

Contents · Previous · Next