13. Explicit codimension-one Dirac test
The previous sections identify the required confinement scale phenomenologically. The next question is whether the canonical codimension-one Dirac geometry itself produces that scale.
For a hypersurface , choose a unit normal and a local orthonormal tangent frame , . In a tubular neighbourhood the ambient Dirac operator has the schematic decomposition
up to the conventional sign of and the convention used for mean curvature . Here is the three-dimensional spatial Dirac operator and the curvature term is the codimension-one extrinsic contribution.
For a round three-sphere of radius embedded in flat four-space, the normalized mean curvature is
The spatial Dirac spectrum on the round is
so the smallest absolute eigenvalue is
At the nucleon-scale radius inferred above,
this gives
This is not the required nucleon confinement contribution
Therefore
The scalar Laplacian does not repair the mismatch. Its first nonconstant eigenvalue on is
which corresponds to the momentum scale
at fm.
Thus the successful -- MeV scale is not an ordinary spatial eigenvalue of a round .
14. The normal oscillator is the viable channel
The scale that does line up is the normal confinement quantum.
For a codimension-one coordinate normal to , introduce the local oscillator Hamiltonian
Its characteristic quantum is
The V2 oscillator-symbol construction already associates one position and one momentum quadrature with every spatial direction. Removing the fourth accessible direction therefore removes one complete complex oscillator amplitude
To obtain a frequency multiplier one may separately assume equal oscillator energy and unchanged action per surviving direction. Then
and again
The resulting three-dimensional mass contribution per quark is
This is distinct from the spatial Dirac curvature energy .
If the normal oscillator length and frequency satisfy the relativistic confinement scaling
then
At
one obtains
and
This agrees with the proton and neutron excess-energy values derived independently from their masses:
The mismatch is at the few- to relative level if is chosen near the common mass-inferred radius.
15. What is and is not derived
The calculation now separates three statements with different logical status.
15.1 Conditional frequency-rescaling ansatz
The dimensional reduction
removes one oscillator amplitude. Under the separately imposed frequency-rescaling ansatz,
This ratio is a model input here, not a consequence of total-action conservation.
15.2 Ruled out as the source of the nucleon bulk mass
The canonical spatial spectral scales of a round are
for the lowest Dirac mode and
for the first scalar momentum scale. Neither gives the observed nucleon excess at the physical radius.
Thus the bulk mass cannot be identified with the ordinary spatial Dirac or scalar spectrum alone.
15.3 Still missing dynamically
The absolute normal oscillator scale
is not fixed by the currently written V2 master operator. Equivalently, V2 has not yet derived the normal confining potential, boundary condition, or stiffness that would produce
That is the remaining first-principles problem.
The exact operator target is therefore more specific than before. In tubular coordinates around the sector, the normal/extrinsic part of the master operator must reduce to an effective transverse Hamiltonian
or its relativistic Dirac analogue, with lowest characteristic spacing
The projected three-dimensional state must then inherit
16. Sharpened falsification criterion
The dimensional-constriction mass proposal is now falsifiable at the operator level.
Construct the actual normal potential or normal Dirac block generated by
Then compute its lowest normal excitation scale without using nucleon masses or radii.
The mechanism succeeds at leading order only if
because assumed frequency-rescaling constriction then predicts
If the derived normal spectrum instead begins near the spatial round- Dirac scale or another incompatible value, then the proposed explanation of the nucleon bulk mass fails.
This distinction prevents the numerical nucleon agreement from being promoted prematurely to a derivation.
17. Updated status
The explicit operator analysis strengthens and narrows the proposal:
not
The dimensional factor is assumed, not geometrically derived. The absolute normal quantum, approximately MeV for nucleons, is the remaining quantity the master geometry must derive.
This same normal/extrinsic block is already independently required by the CKM analysis to change mode degree during the transition. A successful derivation would therefore explain two otherwise separate phenomena with one operator: