Physical premise (IDWT): Physical spacetime has infinitely many ordinary spatial dimensions plus time. Matter occupies up to ten spatial dimensions; all remaining spatial directions are unbound for every particle. Depth counts a pattern's bound spatial involvement within that space. “Observed” and “unobserved” describe an observer's access, not different kinds of dimension. Older projective and nested-geometry calculations below retain their additional hypotheses; they do not establish a separate physical manifold or compactified direction. See spatial meaning and mathematical scope.

Summary: Research record, section 46: Quaternionic structure of the free-pair active four-space.

Provenance

Preserved from interaction notebook section 46, recorded 2026-09-05 and corrected 2026-09-06. Original sequence contents. This is an exploratory research record, not an independently established V2 result. Read the related later audits before using an intermediate conclusion.

46. Quaternionic structure of the free-pair active four-space

The apparent 2+2+22+2+2 form of R12R_{12} in a convenient basis does not mean that the free pair canonically selects two real two-planes inside its rotating four-space. A stronger invariant structure is present.

Let

R=−J1J2, R=-J_1J_2,

and decompose its symmetric and antisymmetric parts,

C=12(R+RT),A=12(R−RT). C=\frac12(R+R^T), \qquad A=\frac12(R-R^T).

For generic separation 0<θ<π/20<\theta<\pi/2, define the pair-fixed projector

P0=C−cos⁡(2θ)I1−cos⁡(2θ) \boxed{ P_0 =\frac{C-\cos(2\theta)I}{1-\cos(2\theta)} }

and

P4=I−P0. P_4=I-P_0.

The explicit chiral-spinor calculation gives

rank⁡P0=2,rank⁡P4=4. \boxed{ \operatorname{rank}P_0=2, \qquad \operatorname{rank}P_4=4. }

The normalized antisymmetric part

Jpair=Asin⁡(2θ) \boxed{ J_{\rm pair} =\frac{A}{\sin(2\theta)} }

vanishes on the fixed plane and satisfies

Jpair2=−P4. J_{\rm pair}^2=-P_4.

Thus it is an orthogonal complex structure on the active four-dimensional real subspace.

Now restrict the first electron complex structure to that active subspace,

I4=P4J1P4. I_4=P_4J_1P_4.

The exact identities are

I42=−P4,Jpair2=−P4, I_4^2=-P_4, \qquad J_{\rm pair}^2=-P_4,

and

I4Jpair+JpairI4=0. \boxed{ I_4J_{\rm pair}+J_{\rm pair}I_4=0. }

Define

K4=I4Jpair. K_4=I_4J_{\rm pair}.

Then

K42=−P4, K_4^2=-P_4,

and the quaternion relations hold exactly on the active four-space:

I4Jpair=K4,JpairK4=I4,K4I4=Jpair. \boxed{ I_4J_{\rm pair}=K_4, \qquad J_{\rm pair}K_4=I_4, \qquad K_4I_4=J_{\rm pair}. }

All three operators are skew-adjoint orthogonal complex structures.

Therefore

Erot(4) carries a canonical quaternionic structure generated by the pair (J1,J2). \boxed{ E_{\rm rot}^{(4)}\text{ carries a canonical quaternionic structure generated by the pair }(J_1,J_2). }

The commutant of two independent quaternion generators on this real four-space has real dimension four, as expected for the opposite quaternionic action. This confirms that the active space is naturally one quaternionic line rather than a canonically ordered pair of real two-planes.

46.1 Correction to the earlier free-pair split

The basis expression

R=I2⊕R(2θ)⊕R(−2θ) R=I_2\oplus R(2\theta)\oplus R(-2\theta)

remains correct, but its two rotating planes are not invariantly distinguished by the pair alone. The canonical decomposition is

R6=Rfixed2⊕Hpair, \boxed{ \mathbb R^6 =\mathbb R^2_{\rm fixed} \oplus \mathbb H_{\rm pair}, }

where Hpair\mathbb H_{\rm pair} denotes the active real four-space equipped with the quaternionic structure above.

This is stronger than the earlier 2+2+22+2+2 description and removes an artificial choice of two-plane basis within the active four-plane.

46.2 Consequence for a free-electron locking interaction

A free-pair interaction built only from pair invariants should respect this quaternionic symmetry unless another physical structure breaks it.

Therefore a candidate that singles out one particular real 2+22+2 decomposition inside Erot(4)E_{\rm rot}^{(4)} is not pair-canonical.

The minimal pair-native quadratic interaction must instead be constructed from the invariant projectors

P0,P4, P_0, \qquad P_4,

and quaternionic-invariant tensors on Erot(4)E_{\rm rot}^{(4)}.

This sharply restricts the next search.