Numbered calculations with their assumptions and subsequent corrections.

1. Question

  • Question

    Research record, section 1: Question.

2. Two different notions of encounter

3. Electron-electron scattering is therefore not the same as electron-electron full-depth contact

4. General depth-mediated interaction rule

5. First comparison with the observed interaction pattern

11. Next proof obligations

14. Central full-depth dynamics does not by itself prove unobserved-visible coincidence

18. A stronger invariant candidate from two complex structures

19. Exchange symmetry and Pauli suppression of full-depth contact

20. Generalization to unequal particle depths

24. Present verdict

25. Pair-invariant collapse on the electron sector

26. Direct projection of the current V2 scalar quartic into a two-electron channel

28. Historical quadratic kernel as a candidate pre-contact force

29. First direct verdict on K66K_{66} from presently written V2

30. Electromagnetic pre-contact steering: a dimensional Green-function test

31. A useful decomposition of the electromagnetic problem

32. Can a pulled-back depth-two connection reduce unobserved transverse momentum?

33. Consequence for the original electron-beam proposal

34. Updated verdict after testing the current scalar and electromagnetic sectors

35. Projector-dynamics audit of the remaining unobserved-steering channel

37. Next proof obligation

38. Correction: do not extrapolate ordinary 3D field equations into the higher sector

39. The inverse lifting problem from observed electromagnetism

40. Compression is not the same as effective reduced dynamics

41. The reciprocal pushforward formulation is more faithful to current V2

42. First classification of observationally invisible higher-depth operators

43. Implication for visible-unobserved collision correlation

44. Minimal self-adjoint unobserved-visible lock with exactly zero relaxed backreaction

45. Canonical free-pair operator from two electron complex structures

46. Quaternionic structure of the free-pair active four-space

47. Simultaneous commutant and its limited no-mixing theorem

48. One- and two-vector outer-product mixed ansatzes

50. Conditional relative-separation theorem under two individual beam locks

51. Two individual locks reduce to one exact relative restoring mode

54. Electromagnetic two-form alignment: compatibility, circularity, and rank obstruction

55. Candidate scan for a dynamically selected mixed frame

56. Orthonormalized scattering-frame candidate and exact Schur compatibility

58. Frequency normalization requires the correct lock coordinate and kinetic metric

59. Audit of existing V2 candidates for the dimensionless lock coefficient

60. Maurer--Cartan test: the scattering frame alone cannot generate its own restoring curvature

61. Projector-curvature candidate: nonzero geometry beyond the pure-gauge frame map

62. Canonical projector geometry: the rank-three Grassmannian has isotropic Ricci eigenvalue four

63. Grassmannian sigma-model and Jacobi audit: where the eigenvalue four actually enters

64. Dirac-projector commutator: a conditional sigma-model construction

65. Linear Dirac-action variation does not fix the projector sigma-model coefficient

66. Orbit-generator spectrum versus the physical mixed block

67. Moment maps do not automatically select the frame-lock orbit

68. Orbit-rate audit: three electron clocks are distinct until the stationary master generator identifies them

71. Axial mixed tensors do not determine the orbit-generator spectrum

72. Beam-axis spinor decomposition: the orbit generator requires a bilinear lock term

73. Three-axis contraction test: summing three depth-six channels does not yield the required axial bilinear

74. Orbit generator as a polynomial of the total locked axial spin

75. Locked-spin gap theorem: the orbit polynomial is uniquely fixed by the existing unit and two-unit projective gaps

76. Gap-origin audit: primitive winding and orientation reversal do not derive the two-unit branch

77. Extremal-doublet audit: the two-unit gap follows from a primitive signed amplitude charge, but that charge is still an input

78. Primitive cocharacter norm test: the desired amplitude charge is the unique minimum-norm choice

79. Rejected identification audit: an embedded-U(1)U(1) curvature would select q=1q=1, but it is not the Hopf connection

81. Beam-axis symmetry leaves the integral charge free

82. Physical (3,1)⊕(1,3)(3,1)\oplus(1,3) audit: beam symmetry leaves qq free; frame exchange would select q=1q=1

83. Reciprocity audit: Hermiticity does not force observed-unobserved exchange symmetry

84. Locked-sector preservation theorem: invariance of the 1⊕3\mathbf1\oplus\mathbf3 split uniquely selects q=1q=1

85. Operator-class refinement: the unwanted q≠1q\neq1 piece is a singlet--triplet vector intertwiner

86. Relative-frame identification: the q≠1q\neq1 mixer is exactly a broken frame-rotation generator

87. Fixed-lock compatibility theorem: q=1q=1 is the unique zero-drift branch of the selected frame

93. Conditional mixed-bilinear singlet selector

94. Correction to Section 93: the Levi--Civita mixed connection contracts to mean curvature and does not by itself supply the nine-component lock operator

95. Quadratic cross-depth route: a first-order 3↔63\leftrightarrow6 transition can generate the full (3,3)(\mathbf3,\mathbf3) lock after Schur elimination

97. Cross-depth channel audit: the canonical factorized normal-spinor contraction does not lock the frames

98. Leading-source orientation no-go: the written scalar and factorized 3↔63\leftrightarrow6 structures can select ss but cannot select the locked frame orientation

99. Correction to the rank-three requirement: a generic rank-two orbital bivector uniquely selects an SO(3)SO(3) frame by orientation-preserving Procrustes completion